home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0244>
- <title>
- Feb. 28, 1994: We Need To Do Some Work
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Feb. 28, 1994 Ministry of Rage:Louis Farrakhan
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- TIME FORUM, Page 29
- We Need To Do Some Work
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Thulani Davis
- </p>
- <p> Novelist, playwright, currently teaching at Barnard College
- </p>
- <p> "Which side are you on?" writer Budd Schulberg asked his friend,
- the writer James Baldwin, 30 years ago. Some black leaders,
- he noted, specifically Elijah Muhammad, then leader of the Nation
- of Islam, thought it was "too late for American whites." So
- where did Baldwin, a "celebrated Negro spokesman," stand? "On
- Elijah Muhammad's side or what you call my sloppy liberal--interracial side?"
- </p>
- <p> The question put to Baldwin is, of course, today being put to
- African-American political and religious leaders, writers and
- columnists, college instructors and rap artists, and many others
- who routinely speak before the public. A New York Times columnist
- has said he's prepared to go to "war," to call all African-American
- intellectuals on the carpet to prove they are not anti-Semites.
- And many of us are appalled because most of us, as Baldwin said
- then, have never been "even vaguely tempted" by Muhammad's racist
- theories.
- </p>
- <p> The question also attempts to set the terms of the discussion,
- to base a discussion of racial conflict solely on African-American
- xenophobia. Like all litmus tests, this one is reductive and
- promotes self-defense rather than thought and disclosure. Black
- anti-Semitism, which does exist, along with any specific analysis
- of historical issues between blacks and Jews, remains a complex
- area that African Americans do not even feel comfortable to
- debate in public. Some who might give black views on our separate
- and unequal assimilation in America and our unequal positions
- today with regard to opportunity, respect and power are quiet.
- Many believe that in such a delicate public discussion it is
- dangerous to risk having words taken out of context, ideas abbreviated
- into unrecognizable and harmful sound bites. They are fearful
- that to take up the issue at all is to run the risk of being
- branded an anti-Semite and a pariah. If the issue is used simply
- to identify enemies, few will step forward.
- </p>
- <p> The fear of black anti-Semitism is not just a fear of the creeping
- acceptability of hate that creates holocausts--a legitimate
- fear we all should have. But the recent reaction to the demagoguery
- of Minister Louis Farrakhan is part of a larger, very American
- fear of black hate. This is a phantom dreamed up by people who
- knew what slavery ought to have created long before Nat Turner
- struck out with his heartless blade. Black hate, though, is
- only a new wrinkle in the increasingly negative portrayal of
- blacks as a whole. Since the Reagan Administration's rollback
- of civil rights, African Americans have consistently been brought
- to the American public as predators--street thugs and welfare
- hustlers, inveterate whiners, cynical, pathological. And because
- the fear is omnipresent, passed on to each group of new immigrants
- settling in the big cities of America, each of us who is the
- dark Other constantly has to prove we are not its realization,
- not carrying Nat's blade.
- </p>
- <p> Our spiritual and moral traditions have always condemned the
- persecution of difference. But the young people who run into
- the well-dressed brothers on the street hawking the Nation of
- Islam's paper do not know about the intimate cooperative work
- done by blacks and Jews in the era roughly spanning the life
- of W.E.B. Du Bois, from the days of immigration from Europe
- to the days leading up to the march on Washington in 1963. They
- do not know much about slavery or the Holocaust in Europe. But
- Minister Farrakhan is there. He says he cares what happens to
- them, a simple statement rarely made. Most of those who excoriate
- him are afraid to set foot in the neighborhoods where the Nation's
- teaching is readily available.
- </p>
- <p> Minister Farrakhan's pat formulations of our troubles sound
- like the scapegoating diatribes of haters here and elsewhere,
- because they are soothing drinks drawn from the same well. Anyone
- who really wants to deal with the impact of Minister Farrakhan
- had better start standing on the same corners he stands on,
- going in the same doors.
- </p>
- <p> We are still allowing people who are not in touch with the problems
- to dictate the terms of the discussion. Most of us have been
- sitting stymied on the sidelines as families, schools, churches,
- neighborhoods, libraries, youth clubs, grocery stores, fire
- stations and hospitals broke apart, were shut down or just disappeared.
- We need some serious and open discussion on racism, hate speech
- and bias crimes held at ground level, such as in the nation's
- public schools. We need to do some work.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-